Call us toll-free

Compare to the structure of DNA.

RNA polymerase reads the coding strand of the DNA and synthesises RNA that is

Approximate price


275 Words


Synthesis of RNA using 2′‐O‐DTM protection.

To obtain the , the building blocks are sequentially coupled to the growing oligonucleotide chain in the order required by the sequence of the product (see Synthetic cycle below). The process has been fully automated since the late 1970s. Upon the completion of the chain assembly, the product is released from the solid phase to solution, deprotected, and collected. The occurrence of side reactions sets practical limits for the length of synthetic (up to about 200 nucleotide residues) because the number of errors accumulates with the length of the oligonucleotide being synthesized. Products are often isolated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to obtain the desired oligonucleotides in high purity. Typically, synthetic oligonucleotides are single-stranded DNA or RNA molecules around 15–25 bases in .

Genomic size of DNA Consider the size of DNA and its structure of being a long, linear polymer.
Photo provided by Pexels

On the other hand, eukaryotic DNA replication is intricately controlled by the cell cycle regulators, and the process takes place during the 'S' or synthesis phase of the cell cycle.

Ribosomes - Protein Synthesis - Cronodon

Process for the Synthesis of Ribo Nucleic Acid (RNA) Using a Novel Deprotection Reagent.
Photo provided by Flickr

Many RTs are available from commercial suppliers. and Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (M-MuLV, MMLV) Reverse Transcriptase are RTs that are commonly used in molecular biology workflows. lacks 3´ → 5´ exonuclease activity. is a recombinant M-MuLV reverse transcriptase with reduced RNase H activity and increased thermostability. It can be used to synthesize first strand cDNA at higher temperatures than the wild-type M-MuLV. The enzyme is active up to 50°C, providing higher specificity, higher yield of cDNA and more full-length cDNA product, up to 12 kb in length.

The synthesis of DNA from an RNA template, via reverse transcription, produces complementary DNA (cDNA). Reverse transcriptases (RTs) use an RNA template and a short primer complementary to the 3' end of the RNA to direct the synthesis of the first strand cDNA, which can be used directly as a template for the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). This combination of reverse transcription and PCR (RT-PCR) allows the detection of low abundance RNAs in a sample, and production of the corresponding cDNA, thereby facilitating the cloning of low copy genes. Alternatively, the first-strand cDNA can be made double-stranded using DNA Polymerase I and DNA Ligase. These reaction products can be used for direct cloning without amplification. In this case, RNase H activity, from either the RT or supplied exogenously, is required.

DNA and RNA structures - What Is Life?

Novel RNA synthesis method using 5′‐silyl‐2′‐orthoester protecting groups.
Photo provided by Flickr

In addition to replication they also play an important role in DNA repair and recombination.

However, DNA polymerases cannot start DNA synthesis independently, and require and 3' hydroxyl group to start the addition of complementary nucleotides.

The use of engineered RTs improves the efficiency of full-length product formation, ensuring the copying of the 5' end of the mRNA transcript is complete, and enabling the propagation and characterization of a faithful DNA copy of an RNA sequence. The use of the more thermostable RTs, where reactions are performed at higher temperatures, can be very helpful when dealing with RNA that contains high amounts of secondary structure.

In eukaryotes, transcription, or synthesis of mRNA, and translation, the synthesis of proteins, are separated in space and time.
Photo provided by Flickr
Order now
  • “Chemical Biology” of DNA polymerases.

    Often DNA is found to be methylated, the result of an enzymatic modification that serves as chemical protection.

  • including chemical synthesis of DNA, ..

    But the DNA strands run in opposite directions, and hence the synthesis of DNA on one strand can occur continuously.

  • and start synthesis of two new strands of DNA, one in each direction.

    Assessment of new 2′‐O‐acetalester protecting group for regular RNA synthesis and original 2′‐modified pro RNA.

Order now

Where does DNA synthesis and replication occur in the …

Chemical synthesis of a very long oligoribonucleotide with 2‐cyanoethoxymethyl (CEM) as the 2′‐O‐protecting group: Structural identification and biological activity of a synthetic 110mer precursor‐microRNA candidate.

Where does DNA synthesis and replication occur in the cell cycle

In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, protein synthesis is very similar in its hierarchy, but differently organized in spatial arrangements and intra-cellular location.

What chemical changes occur during DNA synthesis?

This strand is known as the lagging strand since the process of DNA synthesis on this strand proceeds at a lower rate.

Here, the primase adds primers at several places along the unwound strand.

An In-depth Look at the 7 Major Steps of DNA Replication

When emitted into air, most of the DMF released remains in that compartment, where it is degraded by chemical reactions with hydroxyl radicals. Indirect releases of DMF to air, such as transfers from other environmental media, play only a small role in main taining levels of DMF in the atmosphere. DMF in air is estimated to be photooxidized over a period of days. However, some atmospheric DMF can reach the aquatic and terrestrial environment, presumably during rain events. When DMF is released into water, it degrades there and does not move into other media. When releases are into soil, most of the DMF remains in the soil — presumably in soil pore water — until it is degraded by biological and chemical reaction. Releases to water or soil are expected to be followed by relatively rapid biodegradation (half-life 18–36 h).If DMF reaches groundwater, its anerobic degradation will be slow. The use pattern of DMF is such that exposure of the general population is probably very low.Since most DMF appears to be released to air in the sample country, and based on the fate of DMF in the ambient environment, biota are expected to be exposed to DMF primarily in air; little exposure to DMF from surface water, soil, or benthic organisms is expected. Based on this, and because of the low toxicity of DMF to a wide range of aquatic and soil organisms, the focus of the environmental risk characterization is terrestrial organisms exposed directly to DMF in ambient air.DMF is readily absorbed following oral, dermal, or inhalation exposure. Following absorption, DMF is uniformly distributed, metabolized primarily in the liver, and relatively rapidly excreted as metabolites in urine. The major pathway involves the hydroxylation of methyl moieties, resulting in -(hydroxymethyl)-- methylformamide (HMMF), which is the major urinary metabolite in humans and animals. HMMF in turn can decompose to -methylformamide (NMF). In turn, enzymatic -methyl oxidation of NMF can produce - (hydroxymethyl)formamide (HMF), which further degenerates to formamide. An alternative pathway for the metabolism of NMF is oxidation of the formyl group, resulting in -acetyl--(-methylcarbamoyl) cysteine (AMCC), which has been identified as a urinary metabolite in rodents and humans. A reactive interme diate, the structure of which has not yet been determined (possibly methyl isocyanate), is formed in this pathway; while direct supporting experimental evidence was not identified, this intermediate is suggested to be the putatively toxic metabolite. Available data indicate that a greater proportion of DMF may be metabolized by the putatively toxic pathway in humans than in experimental animals. There is metabolic interaction between DMF and alcohol, which, though not well understood, may be due, at least in part, to its inhibitory effect on alcohol dehydrogenase.Consistent with the results of studies in experimental animals, available data from case reports and cross- sectional studies in occupationally exposed populations indicate that the liver is the target organ for the toxicity of DMF in humans. The profile of effects is consistent with that observed in experimental animals, with gastro intestinal disturbance, alcohol intolerance, increases in serum hepatic enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, -glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase), and histopathological effects and ultrastructural changes (hepatocellular necrosis, enlarged Kupffer cells, microvesicular steatosis, complex lysosomes, pleomorphic mitochondria, and fatty changes with occasional lipogranuloma) being observed. Based on the limited data available, there is no convincing, consistent evidence of increases in tumours at any site associated with exposure to DMF in the occupational environment. Case reports of testicular cancers have not been confirmed in a cohort and case– control study. There have been no consistent increases in tumours at other sites associated with exposure to DMF.There is also little consistent, convincing evidence of genotoxicity in populations occupationally exposed to DMF, with results of available studies of exposed workers (to DMF and other compounds) being mixed. The pattern of observations is not consistent with vari ations in exposure across studies. However, in view of the positive dose–response relationship observed in the one study in which it was investigated, this area may be worthy of additional work, although available data on genotoxicity in experimental systems are overwhelmingly negative.DMF has low acute toxicity and is slightly to moderately irritating to the eyes and skin. No data were identified regarding the sensitization potential of DMF.In acute and repeated-dose toxicity studies, DMF has been consistently hepatotoxic, inducing effects on the liver at lowest concentrations or doses. The profile of effects includes alterations in hepatic enzymes charac teristic of toxicity, increases in liver weight, progressive degenerative histopathological changes and eventually cell death, and increases in serum hepatic enzymes. A dose–response has been observed for these effects in rats and mice following inhalation and oral exposure.Species variation in sensitivity to these effects has been observed, with the order of sensitivity being mice > rats > monkeys. Although the database for carcinogenicity is limited to two adequately conducted bioassays in rats and mice, there have been no increases in the incidence of tumours following chronic inhalation exposure to DMF. The weight of evidence for genotoxicity is over whelmingly negative, based on extensive investigation in assays, particularly for gene mutation, and a more limited database In studies with laboratory animals, DMF has induced adverse reproductive effects only at concentra tions greater than those associated with adverse effects on the liver, following both inhalation and oral expo sure. Similarly, in well conducted and reported primarily recent developmental studies, fetotoxic and teratogenic effects have been consistently observed only at maternally toxic concentrations or doses. Available data are inadequate as a basis for assessment of the neurological or immunological effects of DMF.The focus of this CICAD and the sample risk characterization is primarily effects of indirect exposure in the general environment. Air in the vicinity of point sources appears to be the greatest potential source of exposure of the general population to DMF. Based on the results of epidemiological studies of exposed workers and supporting data from a relatively extensive database of investigations in experimental animals, the liver is the critical target organ for the toxicity of DMF. A tolerable concentration of 0.03 ppm (0.1 mg/m3) has been derived on the basis of increases in serum hepatic enzymes.Data on the toxicity of DMF to terrestrial vascular plants have not been identified. Effect concentrations for indicators of the potential sensitivities of trees, shrubs, and other plants are high; hence, it is unlikely that terres trial plants are particularly sensitive to DMF. For other terrestrial organisms, an estimated no-effects value of 15 mg/m3 has been derived based on a critical toxicity value for hepatic toxicity in mice divided by an application factor. Comparison of this value with a conserva tive estimated exposure value indicates that it is unlikely that DMF causes adverse effects on terrestrial organisms in the sample country.,-Dimethylformamide (CAS No. ) is a colourless liquid at room temperature with a faint amine odour (BUA, 1994). There are many synonyms for this compound, the most common being the acronym DMF. The molecular mass of DMF is 73.09, as calculated from its empirical formula (C3H7NO). DMF sold commer cially contains trace amounts of methanol, water, formic acid, and dimethylamine (BUA, 1994). DMF is miscible in all proportions with water and most organic solvents (Syracuse Research Corporation, 1988; Gescher, 1990; BUA, 1994; SRI International, 1994). DMF is also a powerful solvent for a variety of organic, inorganic, and resin products (SRI Interna tional, 1994). At temperatures below 100 °C, DMF remains stable in relation to light and oxygen (BUA, 1994). Temperatures in excess of 350 °C are required for DMF to decompose into carbon monoxide and dimethylamine (Farhi et al., 1968).Table 1: Physical and chemical properties of DMF. Discussed in section 11.1.3, Sample risk characterization.

Order now
  • Kim

    "I have always been impressed by the quick turnaround and your thoroughness. Easily the most professional essay writing service on the web."

  • Paul

    "Your assistance and the first class service is much appreciated. My essay reads so well and without your help I'm sure I would have been marked down again on grammar and syntax."

  • Ellen

    "Thanks again for your excellent work with my assignments. No doubts you're true experts at what you do and very approachable."

  • Joyce

    "Very professional, cheap and friendly service. Thanks for writing two important essays for me, I wouldn't have written it myself because of the tight deadline."

  • Albert

    "Thanks for your cautious eye, attention to detail and overall superb service. Thanks to you, now I am confident that I can submit my term paper on time."

  • Mary

    "Thank you for the GREAT work you have done. Just wanted to tell that I'm very happy with my essay and will get back with more assignments soon."

Ready to tackle your homework?

Place an order